Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 01:13

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sea spiders found farming methane-eating microbes in cultivated biofilm - Phys.org
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Do you want to have an XXX chat?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What does it mean when someone says "I'm feeling frisky"?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Raw recap & reactions: Royal chaos - Cageside Seats
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Do older men realize that younger women usually do not prefer them?
Let’s just make it real clear:
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?